Reflection #3

Since the last time I wrote about my research, I learned that terrorism is viewed very similar depending on the country you are in or the beliefs you have, etc. However, what I learned about myself was that I didn’t have the ability to do work consistently since the ability of working with another person was hopeless and was a regret as they lacked of knowledge to dedicate their time on the project. Anyways, we decided to draw natural land factors to show how multiple perspectives on terrorism can create ethical conflicts between two opposing forces. A supplemental piece that has been in our visualisations has been to do an atomic bomb and place the objects who portray another certain object as all being terrorists at the top of the bomb and the objects being displayed as terrorists being the victims of the atom bomb’s blast, proving that the bias of the object is a purpose that creates conflict since it provides a propaganda that certain countries should all be viewed as a majority of a terrorist group and not by the minority. It shows the innocence of all of those people whose country has terrorists groups being killed by the explosion and radiation of the bomb. In order to do this, we need to provide deep information of how the atomic bomb relates to the conflicts of terrorism and how the people being affected by it have to relate to it. The ongoing collaboration is not working well as the other group member works separately from his group and prefers to talk to other groups’ members.