On the article “Understanding Terrorism,” it talks about how people don’t realize that terrorism isn’t simply just terrorism. There is a complexity into what it really is and how it has multiple choices/perspectives. This relates to the driving question because how people view terrorism isn’t just one-minded; it’s open-minded and that’s what multiple perspectives represents on the topic. Another article is “Ethics of Terrorism.” This article explains how terrorism can be portrayed differently depending on your ideological, religious, or political group and the various parts of the world. The last article is “One Man’s Terrorist Victims’ Perspectives on Terrorism” in which it talks about how people react or believe terrorist groups or incidents as. It’s a way of propaganda and bias, in some ways fooling people to how it usually is. Something new about terrorism is that it can be expressed in various different ways. In other words, there are various types of terrorism. The fact that bias comes in here is fascinating because the object is convincing people to think that people are “this” when they’re actually or most likely not; probably right. Yes, the topic had to be changed because it was very extended. Global conflicts was a very extended topic because many subtopics (which are usually topics) came out of it. In the next steps, we hope to find why and how people view and portray terrorism as how it is but also how and why it brings conflict between societies. The collaboration is good. The only disadvantage is that there is no true answer to terrorism. They are all endless, multiple opinions. Yet, all opinions have to converge to make a conclusion of why terrorism is viewed variously and biased.
0 Comments
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |